A Federal Circuit panel concludes that patents merely applying generic machine learning to new datasets lack eligibility under the Alice framework, requiring a transformative inventive aspect beyond routine computing.
Key points
- Federal Circuit holds Recentive’s ML Training and Network Map patents ineligible under Alice Steps 1 and 2.
- Claims reference generic ML models trained on historical event, venue, and weather datasets without technical detail.
- Patents lack inventive concept as they recite conventional computing components and broad machine learning limitations.
- Court emphasizes that efficiency gains alone cannot convert an abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter.
- Affirms district court’s denial of amendment as any changes would remain technologically conventional.
Q&A
- What is the Alice test?
- Why are generic ML applications unpatentable?
- What constitutes an inventive concept?
- What is an abstract idea in patent law?