A Federal Circuit panel concludes that patents merely applying generic machine learning to new datasets lack eligibility under the Alice framework, requiring a transformative inventive aspect beyond routine computing.

Key points

  • Federal Circuit holds Recentive’s ML Training and Network Map patents ineligible under Alice Steps 1 and 2.
  • Claims reference generic ML models trained on historical event, venue, and weather datasets without technical detail.
  • Patents lack inventive concept as they recite conventional computing components and broad machine learning limitations.
  • Court emphasizes that efficiency gains alone cannot convert an abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter.
  • Affirms district court’s denial of amendment as any changes would remain technologically conventional.

Q&A

  • What is the Alice test?
  • Why are generic ML applications unpatentable?
  • What constitutes an inventive concept?
  • What is an abstract idea in patent law?
Copy link
Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp
Share post via...


Read full article
The Application of Generic Machine Learning to New Data Environments Requires  Something More  to be Patent Eligible | Haug Partners LLP