The Federal Circuit holds that patents claiming machine learning optimization for television scheduling and network mapping do not satisfy Section 101 patent-eligibility. The court applies the Alice two-step framework, finding the claims directed to an abstract idea and lacking an inventive concept beyond generic computing.

Key points

  • Patent claims address dynamic TV scheduling and network mapping via machine learning optimization.
  • Federal Circuit applies Alice two-step test, finding the claims directed to abstract ideas.
  • Claims lack inventive concept, using generic ML and conventional computer components only.

Why it matters: This decision underscores the need for clear technical innovations in AI patent applications, shaping how future machine learning-based inventions will be assessed for eligibility.

Q&A

  • What is Section 101 of the U.S. patent law?
  • What is the Alice two-step framework?
  • Why were the ML TV scheduling patents deemed abstract?
  • What qualifies as an inventive concept in AI patents?
  • How does dynamic network mapping work?
Copy link
Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp
Share post via...


Read full article