We’re Evolving—Immortality.global 2.0 is Incubating
The platform is in maintenance while we finalize a release that blends AI and longevity science like never before.

The Federal Circuit holds that patents claiming machine learning optimization for television scheduling and network mapping do not satisfy Section 101 patent-eligibility. The court applies the Alice two-step framework, finding the claims directed to an abstract idea and lacking an inventive concept beyond generic computing.

Key points

  • Patent claims address dynamic TV scheduling and network mapping via machine learning optimization.
  • Federal Circuit applies Alice two-step test, finding the claims directed to abstract ideas.
  • Claims lack inventive concept, using generic ML and conventional computer components only.

Why it matters: This decision underscores the need for clear technical innovations in AI patent applications, shaping how future machine learning-based inventions will be assessed for eligibility.

Q&A

  • What is Section 101 of the U.S. patent law?
  • What is the Alice two-step framework?
  • Why were the ML TV scheduling patents deemed abstract?
  • What qualifies as an inventive concept in AI patents?
  • How does dynamic network mapping work?
Copy link
Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp
Share post via...


Read full article