The Federal Circuit holds that patents claiming machine learning optimization for television scheduling and network mapping do not satisfy Section 101 patent-eligibility. The court applies the Alice two-step framework, finding the claims directed to an abstract idea and lacking an inventive concept beyond generic computing.
Key points
- Patent claims address dynamic TV scheduling and network mapping via machine learning optimization.
- Federal Circuit applies Alice two-step test, finding the claims directed to abstract ideas.
- Claims lack inventive concept, using generic ML and conventional computer components only.
Why it matters: This decision underscores the need for clear technical innovations in AI patent applications, shaping how future machine learning-based inventions will be assessed for eligibility.
Q&A
- What is Section 101 of the U.S. patent law?
- What is the Alice two-step framework?
- Why were the ML TV scheduling patents deemed abstract?
- What qualifies as an inventive concept in AI patents?
- How does dynamic network mapping work?