Guest Contributor Karl Pfleger argues that instead of debating aging as a disease, regulators should adopt indication-driven frameworks, focusing on distinct subpathologies and clinical significance, drawing lessons from obesity classification to incentivize comprehensive longevity interventions.

Key points

  • Proposes redefining aging as a clinical indication to incentivize multi-disease registrational trials.
  • Breaks aging into targetable subpathologies like senescence and proteostasis for surrogate endpoint development.
  • Uses the ‘clinical obesity’ model to illustrate threshold-based classification and regulatory action.

Why it matters: It lays the groundwork for regulatory strategies that could accelerate multi-disease gerotherapeutic approvals and reshape healthspan interventions.

Q&A

  • What defines a clinical indication versus a disease?
  • What are aging subpathologies?
  • How did obesity classification inform the aging debate?
  • What regulatory reforms could accelerate longevity trials?
Copy link
Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp
Share post via...


Read full article