Guest Contributor Karl Pfleger argues that instead of debating aging as a disease, regulators should adopt indication-driven frameworks, focusing on distinct subpathologies and clinical significance, drawing lessons from obesity classification to incentivize comprehensive longevity interventions.
Key points
- Proposes redefining aging as a clinical indication to incentivize multi-disease registrational trials.
- Breaks aging into targetable subpathologies like senescence and proteostasis for surrogate endpoint development.
- Uses the ‘clinical obesity’ model to illustrate threshold-based classification and regulatory action.
Why it matters: It lays the groundwork for regulatory strategies that could accelerate multi-disease gerotherapeutic approvals and reshape healthspan interventions.
Q&A
- What defines a clinical indication versus a disease?
- What are aging subpathologies?
- How did obesity classification inform the aging debate?
- What regulatory reforms could accelerate longevity trials?