A research team from CSIRO’s Australian e-Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and international collaborators introduce CLIX-M, a clinician-informed 14-item evaluation checklist for explainable AI in clinical decision support systems. CLIX-M spans four categories—Purpose, Clinical, Decision, and Model attributes—offering expert-derived metrics, Likert-scale assessments, and guidance on reporting development and clinical evaluation phases.
Key points
- Introduces CLIX-M, a 14-item checklist covering Purpose, Clinical, Decision, and Model attributes for XAI evaluation.
- Incorporates expert-informed metrics such as domain relevance, coherence, actionability, correctness, confidence, and consistency.
- Utilizes quantitative methods like bootstrapping confidence intervals, feature agreement analysis, and bias assessment tools.
Why it matters: Standardized XAI evaluation enhances transparency and trust, accelerating safe integration of AI-driven decision support into clinical practice.
Q&A
- What is the CLIX-M framework?
- How does CLIX-M improve AI transparency?
- Why use Likert-type scales in CLIX-M?
- When should CLIX-M be applied during AI development?