R.W. Richey critiques the anti-aging movement’s quest for extended lifespans, revealing how the pursuit of immortality could intensify safetyism and reshape parenting norms, travel behavior, and institutional risk policies.
Key points
- R.W. Richey argues that immortality ambitions amplify safetyism to extreme societal risk-aversion.
- Analysis of Bryan Johnson’s anti-aging regimen highlights trade-offs between longevity gains and residual dangers.
- Examines potential shifts in parenting, public policy, and violence prevention under prolonged lifespans.
Q&A
- What is safetyism?
- Who is Bryan Johnson?
- How could parenting change under immortality?
- What are the broader societal impacts?
- Why is violence a critical concern?